Subscribe to Lisa’s Blog

Weekly writing & publishing news, tips, and events — straight to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

I Censored Myself. Was I Wrong?

I censored myself in a blog post a few months back.

censorship
Photo by Brian Wangenheim on Unsplash

Then I started second-guessing the move.

Here’s what happened.

I’ll let you be the judge.

Yoast iconI use the Yoast plugin for WordPress to make sure my posts are SEO friendly. Yoast has done well by me and my website gets thousands of visits a month.

So just before hitting “publish,” I checked Yoast as I usually do. Yikes! It gave me a frowny-face score (red-alert!) on “inclusive language.”  My offense? Including the title of a very old bestselling book as an example of a point I was making: a 1970s bestseller in the thriller category that starts with a “P” and ends with an “O” and is six letters long. The other letters are S, Y, C and H.

Loath to be censored, I also felt loath to say goodbye to ranking on search engines. I caved and omitted the book title, since it wasn’t central to my thesis. Other examples abounded. My SEO score went from red frowny face to green smiley face. And this is how AI is going to destroy humanity.

Is this how AI will destroy humanity?

definition censorship
Photo by Mick Haupt on Unsplash

I’m only half joking. In this case, I felt justified in censoring myself — not much of a loss to delete that one book title as an example. Who cares?

But as we censor ourselves more and more to keep our online soapboxes, we will find that many points of view that speak truth to power will disappear. In fact, they are already diminishing and are certainly disappearing from many public spaces.

I know I have kept from expressing my opinions on various issues from health to politics. And I don’t believe it’s just one side or one party trying to silence the other. This happens on both sides of an issue, on both sides of the political spectrum. And it’s dangerous.

Polarization, intolerance and lack of diversity of opinions

It seems to me that the bandwidth for civil discourse (and freedom of speech) has grown smaller and smaller due to several factors. Here are a few of them:

  • Demonizing each other: When we don’t do our personal work to heal our wounds, we end up projecting our unfinished business onto others. When we try to control others, we must ask ourselves where that comes from. When we don’t listen to opinions that disagree with ours, we can demonize the other, but when we listen, there is always the potential to learn, or at least to exercise compassion. It’s quite possible the other party has something to teach us, even if we disagree with most of their opinions and beliefs. When we don’t listen, we can shut down our compassion and lose touch with the fact that the other person is a human being. (I’m not saying to give space to hate speech – hate is not helpful; but society benefits when we can be civil and listen respectfully to other points of view.)
  • Lack of integrity and inflammatory nature of social media and other platforms: Social media companies are generally not interested in keeping things civil. The structures of these platforms encourage polarization and inflammatory remarks. Many people feel intimidated about putting their work out there, anticipating intense, rude, or even threatening reactions. And many writers have experienced such things. A slightly rude comment might trigger a bad mood or stress, but a particularly threatening reaction can be traumatizing. And it’s not uncommon. An environmental activist I work with shared that she received death threats due to her defense of wildlife. When people fear for their lives, how can they/we feel free to speak and write freely?
  • Concentration of power: As power has become more concentrated (from tech companies and tech billionaires to corporations with huge lobbying budgets and the consolidation of media companies), there’s less room for public discourse and greater potential for those in power to use their algorithms to advance or undermine certain positions and speech. Many people’s livelihoods are tied to their online presence, making it harder to take a stand on specific issues, for fear of losing their livelihood or their ability to continue having an impact online.

How do we resist censorship?

I’d love to hear from readers.

Have you censored yourself online? In what ways? How did it feel?

Or does it feel unsafe even to answer those questions?

Lisa Tener book coachHow do we fight back for freedom?

For speech?

One step is to support those platforms that refuse to censor.

What else?

  • What are you doing?
  • Where are you going to share your ideas? Are there platforms that feel safe?
  • How do you resist censoring yourself?
  • How do you decide when to hit “delete”?

Lisa Tener

Lisa Tener is an award-winning book writing coach who assists writers in all aspects of the writing process—from writing a book proposal and getting published to finding one’s creative voice. Her clients have appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show, CBS Early Show, The Montel Williams Show, CNN, Fox News, New Morning and much more. They blog on sites like The Huffington Post, Psychology Today and WebMD.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Carla King says

    Thoughtful post, Lisa. Yoast is funny that way—it can make you second-guess your writing, and if that means pulling back something that came straight from the heart, that’s not great. You’re right about the broader issue, too. The chilling effect is real, and not just from algorithms. Many of us are self-censoring now because backlash can be so personal and immediate—and because verbal and physical violence are being rewarded. None of the big platforms feel safe anymore. Reddit doesn’t censor much, but it’s a bit of a wild west—and maybe that’s the price of open conversation.

    The upside is that writers today have more power than ever to publish independently—on our own blogs, newsletters, and Substacks, and of course through our books. We can still create the kinds of conversations and communities that algorithms try to stifle. That’s our real freedom—and maybe our best form of resistance.

  2. Deborah a Louth says

    Hi Lisa, I love Carla King’s above synopsis of your censorship woes. Its a very real issue because AI is seemingly taking over the mind of humanity by emotionally manipulating our ideas. Perhaps that is what we need to discover in order to say NO MORE! Once we have the courage to vote – not in my reality will I allow this to happen, other opportunities will present themselves. Once your income is threatened, humanity abandons their stance. Very clever of AI.
    When people come together peacefully against such a takeover, it can change the course we are being herded towards. The future is so uncertain now and we need to use our minds to visualize the kind of future we want to create and find ourselves in, where goodness, kindness and truth prevails. Fly high for Freedom, which is the precept our country was founded upon 250 years ago!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

award winning writing book

Get Lisa's Award-Winning Book

Breathe. Write. Breathe.

18 Energizing Practices to Spark Your Writing & Free Your Voice

Subscribe to Lisa’s Blog

Weekly writing & publishing news, tips, and events — straight to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Screen Shot 2020-09-07 at 10.05.50 PM
Share This